Showing posts with label pollution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pollution. Show all posts

Friday, 11 October 2013

Cash for rats scrapped

Several local councils such as Petaling Jaya and Selayang have stopped offering monetary rewards for catching rats, as it is deemed to be ineffective.

Some local councils had been paying between RM1 and RM2 for every rodent caught.

Other local authorities such as Putrajaya Corporation has been offering hampers as well as cash incentives.

Selayang Municipal Council (MPS) Health Department director Dr Razif Zainol Abidin said they had stopped rewarding the public for catching rats since January this year.

“We are focusing on educating the public rather than rewarding them.

“It has not been effective anyway.

“Catching rats does not translate into being responsible residents who keep their properties clean, including the drains,” he said recently.

He added the most effective way to get rid of rats was through poison.

“Every month, we would identify hotspots and put 100 bed stations of poison in a location.

“From there, we would monitor on a daily basis if the bait has been eaten,” he said.

Dr Razif added the method had proven to be effective as they were able to collect 500 to 600 carcasses at a location every month.

For example, 1,300 dead rats were collected in three weeks in Sri Gombak.

“Challenges we face include the dirty drainage system and the fact that rats breed very rapidly.

“Many drains provide an optimum breeding ground for the rodents,” he said.

He added restaurant owners were not taking care of the drains by filtering their waste and treating them.

“Dirty drains attract pests such as rats, mosquitoes and cockroaches.

“Business operators must be responsible in ensuring the cleanliness of drains surrounding their restaurants,” he said.

MPS had also distributed 100 traps at commercial areas such as food courts.

“We tell them to contact us when the traps are full and we will dispose of them safely.

“We dig a hole and put the carcasses in it but we bleach them first to kill all germs,” he said.

Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) Health and Environment Department director Dr Chitra Davi N. Vadivellu said they had stopped giving RM1 for every rat caught as response from residents was poor.

“We find using an innovative rat trap to catch these rats to be more effective.

“We manage to catch about 200 to 300 rats a month,” she said.

She added the council also has a contractor to help with pest control in the area.

However, Ampang Jaya Municipal Council (MPAJ) public relations officer Norhayati Ahmad said they were still offering RM3 for every rat handed to them.

“Every assemblyman gives RM2 while RM1 comes from MPAJ. About 500 rats were surrendered last year and 312 so far this year,” she said.

The five assemblymen that contribute are Teratai, Lembah Jaya, Cempaka, Bukit Antarabangsa and Hulu Klang.

The council has identified Pasar Pandan Jaya, Bandar Baru Ampang, Keramat, Pekan Ampang and Taman Kosas as hotspots for the rats.

Wednesday, 9 October 2013

Environmental effects: It's our doing

 Human activity is the dominant cause of global warming observed since the 1950s, and scientists predict temperatures will rise another 0.3˚C to 4.8˚C this century.

The world’s leading climate scientists have for the first time established a limit on the amount of greenhouse gases that can be released before the Earth reaches a tipping point and predicted that it will be surpassed within decades unless swift action is taken to curb the current pace of emissions.

The warning was issued recently by a panel of United Nations-appointed climate change experts meeting in Stockholm, Sweden. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimated that once a total of one trillion tonnes of carbon dioxide are emitted into the atmosphere, the planet will exceed 2°C of warming, the internationally agreed-upon threshold to the worst effects of climate change.

“We’ve burned through half that amount” since pre-industrial times, Michael Oppenheimer, a professor of geosciences and international affairs at Princeton University who reviewed the report and is a co-author of the panel’s upcoming report on the effect of climate change, said.

“Because the rates of emissions are growing, it looks like we could burn through the other half in the next 25 years” under one of the more dire scenarios outlined in the report.

Other scenarios show that the threshold will be reached later this century. The finding constitutes a warning to governments to cut emissions of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas, which is generated by the burning of fossil fuels, industrial activity and deforestation.

Calling climate change “the greatest challenge of our time,” panel co-chair Thomas Stocker said humankind’s fate in the next 100 years “depends crucially on how much carbon dioxide will be emitted in the future”.

In the report, the panel said it is 95% certain that human activity is the dominant cause of the global warming observed since the 1950s. That is up from 90% six years ago.

“Human influence has been detected in warming of the atmosphere and the ocean, in changes in the global water cycle, in reductions in snow and ice, in global mean sea level rise, and in changes in some climate extremes,” the report said.

The report is the panel’s fifth major assessment since 1990. It reaffirms many of the conclusions of past reports, but with greater confidence.

“The atmosphere and ocean have warmed, the amounts of snow and ice have diminished, sea level has risen and the concentrations of greenhouse gases have increased,” the panel wrote in a 36-page summary of its findings.

The report also addressed the so-called hiatus, a slowdown in the rise of surface temperature that has been observed over the last 15 years. That slowing of the increase in temperatures has been seized on by sceptics to cast doubt on the science of climate change. The report touches the subject only briefly, saying that temperatures fluctuate naturally in the short term and “do not in general reflect long-term climate trends”.

Brenda Ekwurzel, a climate scientist for the Union of Concerned Scientists, said the slowdown is more like a speed bump, a result of heat being trapped and circulated through the ocean and atmosphere in different ways rather than a fundamental change in the climate. She said surface temperature is just one of many expressions of climate change, including sea level rise, melting ice and ocean acidification.

“The global average temperature is one kind of a thermometer, but an even bigger thermometer is the ocean, which is absorbing most of the excess heat that climate change is creating,” she said.

The report updates predictions of how temperature and sea level are expected to rise over the century.

The panel now expects sea level to rise globally by 26cm and 82cm by century’s end, up from the rise of 17cm to 57cm it projected in 2007.

Those figures now include the contribution of massive ice sheets in Antarctica and Greenland that are creeping toward the ocean as they melt. The panel failed to account for that variable in its previous report, prompting criticism from the scientific community that its previous sea level rise projections were too low.

The panel also lowered the bottom of the range of temperature increase expected over the long term if carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere double. The planet would warm by at least 1.5°C even if aggressive action is taken to cut emissions, but temperatures could rise as much as 4.5°C in other scenarios.

“If no action is taken, no way will you be in the lower band,” Michel Jarraud, secretary-general of the UN’s World Meteorological Organisation said.

Environmental activists greeted the report with calls for government action.

“This IPCC climate science assessment tells us in the strongest possible terms that we ignore climate change at our great peril,” said Earthjustice president Trip Van Noppen.

The assessment was written by more than 800 scientists from around the world. The panel does not conduct its own research, but collects and summarises thousands of peer-reviewed scientific studies. The report will inform negotiations toward a new international climate treaty to cut greenhouse gas emissions that is supposed to be reached by 2015. – Los Angeles Times/McClatchy-Tribune Information Services

Monday, 21 January 2013

Pollutants in river could be waste from mills or unknown sources

The pollutants found in Sungai Semenyih could be industrial waste from palm oil mills or unknown sources along the river and its tributaries, said Konsortium Abass.

Its chairman Suhaimi Kamaralzaman said it had yet to identify the responsible party as there were quite a number of mills and factories upstream of the Sungai Semenyih Water Treatment Plant at Jenderam Hilir.

“The unknown discharge polluted the water and resulted in a foul smell which could not be treated by the plant. It had to be shut down to prevent the polluted water from producing an undesirable quality of treated water,” he said in a statement yesterday.

He said its raw water pumps, with a capacity of 682 million litres per day (mld), had to stop operation for around two and a half hours to allow the polluted water to pass by.

“Therefore, for two and a half hours stoppage, the quantity of water that we could not treat was at least 71 mld,” he said.

Suhaimi said preventing such incidents in future required coordinated efforts from the authorities, including Lembaga Urus Air Selangor and the Department of Environment, to conduct regular and random inspections.